Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/SK902.16.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, s(+(y, x)))
F(s(x)) → G(x, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, s(+(y, x)))
F(s(x)) → G(x, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, s(+(y, x)))
F(s(x)) → G(x, s(x))
G(s(x), y) → +¹(y, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 2 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

+¹(x, s(y)) → +¹(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
+¹(x1, x2) = +¹(x1, x2)
s(x1) = s(x1)

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[+^1₂, s_1]

Status:

s₁: [1]
+^1₂: multiset

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

G(s(x), y) → G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, s(+(y, x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

G(s(x), y) → G(x, +(y, s(x)))
G(s(x), y) → G(x, s(+(y, x)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
G(x1, x2) = G(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
+(x1, x2) = +
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[G₁, s_1] > +
0 > +

Status:

G₁: [1]
+: multiset
0: multiset
s₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → 1
f(s(x)) → g(x, s(x))
g(0, y) → y
g(s(x), y) → g(x, +(y, s(x)))
+(x, 0) → x
+(x, s(y)) → s(+(x, y))
g(s(x), y) → g(x, s(+(y, x)))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(0)
f(s(x0))
g(0, x0)
g(s(x0), x1)
+(x0, 0)
+(x0, s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.